Webroot vs bitdefender password#

Despite these shortcomings, Webroot’s scans are notably faster, averaging 6 minutes. In a ransomware test, it stopped only 7 out of 23 threats. In our experiment with 1,200 malware specimens, Webroot identified 94.3% of them, a respectable outcome but not on par with leading antivirus programs, like Norton or Bitdefender.

It provides various scan options such as Deep, Full, Quick, and customizable scans, along with scheduling features. Webroot relies on cloud technology and heuristic methods to identify threats, minimizing CPU and disk space usage. If you want the best protection, we recommend Norton. Both Norton and Kaspersky offer more features at a considerably lower price.

Webroot vs bitdefender password#

Webroot offers anti-malware, anti-phishing, a firewall, a password manager, a VPN, and more. Webroot does not participate in the performance tests by the independent test labs. Webroot does not participate in the anti-malware protection tests by the independent test labs. That said, until Webroot participates in the independent tests, we would stick to one of the proven winners, such as Norton or Bitdefender.

On the upside, Webroot includes all essential security features, such as a firewall, password manager (from LastPass), identity theft protection, and an anti-tracker. It was in last place out of 20 brands, far behind Norton, Bitdefender, McAfee, and Kaspersky. The last time Webroot participated in AV-test trials was in June 2019 it scored only 2 out of 6 points in the protection test. Without these tests, we have no verifiable benchmark to compare it against. Webroot does not participate in the independent tests by AV-Test or AV-Comparatives, which is not a good sign. Webroot is ranked #19 out of 20 antivirus software.